Sunday, 19 November 2006
|
|
JYF Epistle
| |
|
Junior Young Friends Camp 2006
Totoranui, Golden Bay, South Island
Even with two JYF camps already under many of our belts most people who attended the camp could not deny that the weaving of activities and location with the theme was perhaps the tightest merging possible. In an isolated environment like Totoranui two hours away from any convenient store or cellular telephone reception, people were forced sometimes unwillfully to engage with their immediate surroundings and do as the theme suggested “more with less” . The outdoor activities were mostly generated by the imagination of Albie Burgers who pulled many people out of their immediate comfort zones. Be it kayaking in the open sea, planting 120 trees or doing a 15-minute ropewalk through the bush without the use of our eyes ignited the glorious spirit of adventure.
By providing the camp with a highly relevant theme and compiling people that usually would never have the chance to meet, people ended up relishing the differences from their usual company. With such an accepting environment many people were able to be themselves and express their own opinions to accepting and open minded listeners. This ranged from highly scripted and predictable to highly intellectual and politically aware discussion. When compared to other camps, Totoranui was far less structured which was a welcomed contrast to the previous year.
The lush native bush, great golden sands and beautiful blue sea surrounding our location was certainly inspiring to many environmental activists and was aided by the flamboyant guest speaker Green MP Mike Ward sharing his ideals. But perhaps more inspiring was Albie Burgers’ demonstrating simple yet effective and bizarrely cheap methods through his inventions to save electricity in the realm of solar heating.
Without any interruptions from combustion vehicles or other creators of unwanted distractions, Quaker silences were actually… silent. Many people took this opportunity to gather their thoughts and emotions, this process aided people by supplying them with the courage and determination to express themselves in whatever way they saw fit.
Overall most people would be hard pressed to argue that JYF didn’t make them a more complete, kinder and when all was said and done, a better person. Hopefully.
(posted by Anna, but written, as far as I know, by Jesse & Johnny! Sorry it's taken me so long to put up...)
| |
Wednesday, 20 September 2006
|
|
No Arms Race at Our Place
| |
|
Hi Friends,
A number of Wellington Young, and not so young, Friends (SOYFA) gathered on
Friday 8 September to share concerns and thoughts about what is happening at Te
Papa again this October. The feeling among all present was that it was something
we wanted to continue to discuss and to take action against, in a distinctly
Quakerly way.
Over the last four years, the Defence Industry Association has been hosting a
conference at ‘Our Place’ Te Papa Tongarewa. It’s an Arms Fair, where
international companies, as well as NZ companies, get together to have a big old
show-off about the latest and greatest in weapons technology. They sign
contracts and make deals to further their own interests. These people are making
a profit by producing killing machines, and better yet, they’re doing it in our
national museum.
International companies who attend the Weapons Conference include
· Boeing, who, among other things, make cruise missiles;
· General Dynamics, whose killing machines include nuclear submarines for the
United States Navy; and
· Rockwell Collins, who provide navigation products for precision-guided
missiles, the so-called 'smart' bombs that have been killing civilians in towns
and cities all over Iraq, Afghanistan, Palestine and now Lebabnon.
New Zealand companies who attend the Weapons Conference include
· Flexisolutions from Foxton, whose creatively named weapons include the
"Jungle Sweeper grenade";
· MAS Zengrange from Lower Hutt, who make a whole range of remote firing
systems;
· Oscmar from Auckland, who make 'realistic' shoot-to-kill laser training
equipment, infantry weapons effects simulators, shoulder launched anti-tank
weapon simulators, land mines effects simulators, (and more!); and
· Rakon from Auckland, who make key components in "smart
bombs" and has a contract with Rockwell, who supplies the Israeli Military
Forces. (Attached below to this blog is article (heavily edited to aid
digrestion) from the NZ Herald about Rakon.
The bombs dropping in Lebanon right now have components labelled "Made
In NZ". As taxpayers supporting the Ministry of Defence and Ministry and Trade
and Industry NZ, we are helping to fund the manufacture of these bombs.
Every day global military expenditure is equivalent to (US) $ 2,835,616,438.
(That’s in the billions my friends)
Every day, on average, close to thirty thousand children under the age of
five die from malnutrition or disease because they do not have access to
adequate food, clean water, or basic health care. Thousands more children are
maimed, traumatised or killed in armed conflict and war.
Knowing this, the New Zealand government chooses to promote and support
companies that manufacture and export weapons related products.
This is why we, Wellington Young Friends, have chosen to have a
presence at the Weapons Conference at Te Papa, on the 17th and 18th of October,
and to take action before the event to try and prevent it
happening.
We each made a commitment to talk to people we know about the
Conference, to help bring it to more peoples’ attention, and we began have begun
to make plans of other ways we can protest this event.
Other groups, such as Peace Movement Aotearoa and Peace Action Wellington
will be protesting at Te Papa, as they have done previous years, and their
campaign was launched on Saturday the 2nd of September.
If you’re interested to hear more about what SOYFA does to stop the Weapons
Conference, you could contact Hannah Newport (04) 3835887 or Ruth Collingham
(04) 3813429.
If you’re interested in knowing more about the Conference, companies who
attend, and other protests are taking place, visit:
www.peacewellington.tk
www.converge.org.nz/pma/nowarp.htm
www.indymedia.org.nz
Attatched at the bottom of this blog is an article written by a member of
Peace Action Wellington about last year’s protest (Urs_article.doc).
To read an amazing letter which the Students for Justice in Palestine wrote
to the Manager of Te Papa visit: http://indymedia.org.nz/newswire/display/71640/index.php
And lastly:
http://www.stuff.co.nz/stuff/0,2106,3789971a10,00.html
"Prime Minister Helen Clark said yesterday that the Cabinet had agreed to
lend Right Hemisphere up to $US8m ($NZ12.2m) over three years to keep the
joint-venture company and its staff in New Zealand... The company designs
software for several US military suppliers, including Black Hawk helicopter
manufacturer Sikorsky Aircraft, Bell Helicopter, Halliburton, the principal
supplier to US armed forces in Iraq, and Lockheed Martin, the world's largest
defence contractor."
In Peace
Hannah
Urs_article.doc
Edited RAKON article.doc
| |
Monday, 14 August 2006
|
|
Exempt bodies . . .
| |
|
Hey guys,
This is a little random . . . but hopefully interesting! I've been thinking lately about marriage/civil unions and how they fit with my beliefs. I just had a look at the Births, Deaths and Marriages website (Dept. of Internal Affairs) www.bdm.govt.nz and found the following information about organisations that are exempt from the standard requirements around marriage/civil unions. My understanding (please correct me if I'm wrong) is that Quakers are one of these groups. I'm not entirely sure what form the Quaker exemption takes, so if anybody knows please could they post it here?! The basic tone of my wonderings is this:
1. Do I feel a standard marriage/civil union would fit comfortably with my beliefs?
2. If not, would a Quaker wedding/civil union?
3. If not, is anybody else in the same boat, and should we start up a new 'body' and apply for a new exemption so that we could have important and legally recognised ceremonies of this sort that are consistent with our beliefs/values?
My current feeling is that I don't quite like standard marriage/CU requirements because you have to say who you're being married "by". If I get married I intend to marry myself, lol, not be acted upon by some random third party. Even if that 3rd party was Quakers, I'm not sure I'm entirely comfortable with that. I've been reading again about medieval marriage and it appeals to me that, historically, any two people could marry each other by simply making a statement to that effect. I know this will seem really petty to some people, but it really grates on me that I can't just do that! When did the other rules sneak in?
Anyway, looking forward to hearing your wise words, and here's the bit about exempt bodies from the Civil Union Act 2004 (available on line from:
http://www.legislation.govt.nz/browse_vw.asp?content-set=pal_statutes&clientid=157055&viewtype=contents)
Civil Union Act 2004
Section 1.
EXEMPT BODIES
1.Application to become exempt body—
(1)A body that wishes to become an exempt body must apply to the Registrar-General for exemption in the prescribed form.
(2)The application must set out—
(a)the name and contact address of the body; and
(b)the objects and beliefs of the body; and
(c)the approximate number of its members who are of or over the age of 16; and
(d)an explanation of why the objects and beliefs of the body are inconsistent with the requirements of this Act for the solemnisation of a civil union; and
(e)the rules and procedures that the body proposes to apply when solemnising a civil union.
(3)The application must be signed by at least 10 members of the body who are of or over the age of 16, each of whom must give their age and address, and the signatures must be accompanied by a statutory declaration, signed by a person who is not a member, to the effect that the signatories are who they claim to be and are members of the body.
2.Registrar-General or Minister may grant exemption—
(1)The Registrar-General may agree to grant the exemption applied for if any prescribed application fee is paid and the Registrar-General is satisfied that—
(a)the objects and beliefs of the body are inconsistent with the requirements of this Act for the solemnisation of a civil union; and
(b)the rules and procedures that the body proposes to apply when solemnising a civil union are generally consistent with this Act and are otherwise satisfactory.
(2)If the Registrar-General fails or refuses to agree to exempt the body, he or she must refer the matter to the Minister.
(3)The Minister must agree to grant the exemption sought if he or she is satisfied as to the matters referred to in subclause (1), but, if the Minister is not so satisfied, he or she must refuse the application.
(4)The Registrar-General must advise the applicant of the result of the application.
(5)When the Registrar-General or the Minister agrees to exempt a body from the requirements of this Act for the solemnisation of a civil union, the Registrar-General must give notice in the Gazette of that fact, and the body is exempt from the date specified in the notice.
3.Exempt body to notify changes—
(1)An exempt body must notify the Registrar-General if—
(a)it changes its name; or
(b)it changes its objects and beliefs in a way that impacts on why it considers that the requirements of this Act for the solemnisation of a civil union are inconsistent with those objects and beliefs; or
(c)it changes its rules and procedures for solemnising civil unions.
(2)If the body notifies the Registrar-General that it has changed its name, the Registrar-General must give notice of that fact in the Gazette.
(3)The Registrar-General must ask the Minister to cancel the exemption of an exempt body if the Registrar-General is satisfied that,—
(a)as a result of changes referred to in subclause (1)(b) or (c), the body should no longer be an exempt body; or
(b)the body has failed to conduct one or more civil unions in accordance with its rules and procedures as most recently notified to the Registrar-General.
(4)If the Minister decides that the body should no longer be an exempt body, the Registrar-General must give notice in the Gazette that the body is no longer an exempt body, and notify the body accordingly.
(5)A body ceases to be an exempt body on the date on which the notice referred to in subclause (4) is published in the Gazette.
16.Solemnisation by exempt body—
(1)A civil union may be solemnised by an exempt body if it is solemnised in accordance with the rules and procedures of the body as most recently notified to the Registrar-General in accordance with Schedule 1.
(2)When a civil union is solemnised by an exempt body, the obligations imposed on civil union celebrants by section 62B of the Births, Deaths, and Marriages Registration Act 1995 must be performed by the person or office holder, or in the manner, as set out in the rules and procedures of the exempt body that have been most recently notified to the Registrar-General in accordance with Schedule 1.
| |
|
|
Boundaries and nurture in Quaker Meeting
| |
|
How precious is an hour of Meeting for Worship (or what
ever you care to call it) each week?
At the Young Friends group in Wellington yesterday we talked about the
meeting and what we valued about it. We also talked about how our physical
behaviour contributed to our experience. In small groups we talked a little
about all sorts of things including those of us who fidgeted through the
whole hour, those who struggled to be on time each week, and those who loved the
few times they felt really still and centred.
We wondered about whether we have any 'rules' of behaviour for Meeting, and
if these are necessary. Do we need complete silence to gather together; is it
the silence that's important, or the being together?Does it matter if people are
coming in late for up to half an hour? Does it matter if people make a lot of
noise with their clothes, sweet wrappers or books during Meeting?
We also wondered about whether it is good to have some people in the meeting
whose task it is to specifically uphold the 'worship' or 'gatheredness'.
Traditionally people have been asked to do this and these people were called
Elders. Now Elders have a lot more 'jobs' in the Meeting, and this isn't their
only role. Other people say 'everyone's an elder' so you don't need people who
are concentrating on it specifically, as everybody should be.......
If we are going to only meet together once a week for an hour (or less), is
it worth taking collective responsibility to be on time and share that whole
time together, or are we too busy these days to make that sort of commitment? Is
everyone only responsible for and accountable to, themselves, or is there
collective resopnsibility and accountability? Is Meeting for Worship a free for
all, with everything said in ministry or done during the hour OK, or are there
some boundaries? (mostly unwritten...this is Quakers after all....!!!) Of course
if you bring up any scenario, there will always be an exception in which it was
alright, but can there be some general guidelines, or do we not need them? Do we
value or even need any structure?
If we don't need any guidelines to help further our spiritual journey
together, then do we need people to be elders. Are they an outdated modality and
we have now moved on. Is tolerance the only thing we can agree on, so we don't
ask for any other commonality between us for fear of scaring people away? Is
tolerance the only tenet of Quakerism or is the Spirit and our collective as
well as individual understanding of it important?
These are some of the areas we are exploring in Wellington Meeting as we try
to find the right way forward for our meeting for worship and our elders.
About 20 people were at the SOYFA group last night, and I'm sure some of them
will have additions to this posting. There were lots of interesting stories and
ideas. Many of you weren't there - is this something worth exploring,
or is it not relevant to us as YF's?
I'd be really interested to know your thoughts......
Marion
(PS there's an article on the history of elders in Quakers, which I can post
here if people want me to....)
Marion's Observations on Eldership.doc
| |
Thursday, 10 August 2006
|
|
Wellington YFs August
| |
|
Just a reminder that this Sunday 13 August, 6pm will be the next Young Friends meeting in Wellington - all welcome!
We will attempt to cover two themes:
(1) Eldership and its relationship to the Meeting for Worship. What is precious to us in Meeting for Worship and how do each of us enrich
this? Is it useful to ask certain people to help with this and are these people elders? We shall explore why Quakers have elders and what they do (and don't do). If we have time we'll also look at the future of elders in our society.
(2) We will also be concerned with (over worship and dinner), the current situation in the Middle East and links with Friends there, and with the up-coming armaments fair at Te Papa and whether we wish to take any action.
As always it will be at the Quaker Centre (Moncrief St, Wellington) with the usual format:
6.00 Meeting for Worship
6:30 Shared potluck dinner
7:30 Worship sharing/discussion
9.00 Close
Hope to see you there!
Frances for Wellington YFs
| |
Wednesday, 05 July 2006
|
|
Online Meeting for Worship
| |
|
In Wellington this Sunday (9 July) I will be leading a session with our YF group about 'Quakers on the internet', looking at the blogs and other resources available. As part of the session we will be doing a short 'Online Meeting for Worship', at some point between 8.30pm and 9pm. It would be lovely if you could join us - either in person:
Wellington Quaker Centre, Moncrieff St, 6pm for 'normal' Meeting for Worship, 6.30pm for shared meal (bring food...) and 7.30pm for discussion,
or in person online:
http://worship.quaker.org , 8.30pm onwards.
And if you can't make it at that time, have a look at the site anyway, as there is often a meeting going on at all sorts of times (and places - this is an international site, and bear in mind that the time zones don't seem to be quite right at the moment)
Hope to see you (somewhere) soon,
Love, Frances
| |
Sunday, 11 June 2006
|
|
Questions about becoming "Aotearoa New Zealand Young Friends Meeting"
| |
|
Hey People
The following posts are questions we would like you to post responses to.
They are all related to giving us a firmer idea and understanding of why we as a collective group want to become a formal structure in our own right.
The more feedback the better so the Young Friends Committee can take it to Yearly Meeting and answer with confidence the questions we invisage being asked!
Ultimately the information that we gather from this will also start to drive actual process of becoming "Aotearoa New Zealand Young Friends Meeting"
cheers! Ben (on behalf of the YF Committee)
| |
|
|
Why?
| |
|
Why do we as Young Friends want to become a formal structure in our own right?
| |
|
|
What is it?
| |
|
What do we invisage "Aotearoa NZ Young Friends Meeting" as being?
| |
|
|
What will change?
| |
|
How is becoming "Aotearoa New Zealand Young Friends Meeting" going to change the way Young Friends works?
| |
|
|
How?
| |
|
How are we going to go about the process of becoming our own formal structure (General Meeting or whatever)?
| |
|
|
Who?
| |
|
Who is going to make this happen?
| |
|
|
The Role of Quakers
| |
|
What is the role we want the wider Quaker Community to play in this process?
| |
|
|
When?
| |
|
What is the time frame we expect to accomplish this in or the various parts/stages?
| |
Saturday, 27 May 2006
|
|
YF Committee Meeting Minutes 21-05-06
| |
|
Present at the meeting were: Thomas Watts, Ben Watts, Julian Carver,
Sue Stover (as YF support person)
Apologies: Jim Green
The following is the basic outcomes of that meeting:
THE ROLES:
YF Clerk: Thomas Watts - Ongoing tasks include clerking meetings, liaising with YM clerk, keeping in touch with the other members of the YF committee, and staying on top of all YF business.
Assistant YF Clerk: Ben Watts - Ongoing tasks include taking and distributing minutes from YF meetings, creating agendas before those meetings, receiving and distributing information for YF's generally.
Communications: Julian Carver - Ongoing task include maintaining and expanding the existing communication networks. Julian is also going to act as YF Camp support person, and assist the treasurer.
Treasurer: Jim Green - Ongoing tasks will include keeping thumb on YF funds, keeping track of YF camp auditing, and liaising with YM treasurer.
Those who expressed interest in being involved with the committee but didn't want to take an explicit role on the committee have been noted and will be contacted to help out when the need arises. The YF Committee will actively seek assistance on jobs not directly related to their job descriptions.
TERMS:
We decided that appointments should be for 2 years and will run from YF Camp to YF Camp - so we will look for new people to take on the YF committee roles at YF Camp 2008. However this may need to be reviewed as a complete overhaul of the committee would remove all the institutional knowledge.. so maybe people should just have their positions reviewed or something..
YF SUPPORT PERSON:
Sue Stover has indicated that she is not comfortable remaining YF support person with two of her children also on the committee and has decided to step down from her position.
There are two options from here:
1. Appoint a new YF Support Person
2. We decide that we are a stable enough committee, confident to exist
without a YF Support Person.
INTERACTION WITH THE YF GROUP
We intend to communicate with the whole YF group prior to and post committee meetings. This will be the main way decisions are made, with the committee generally just playing a coordination role.
All YF’s are welcome to attend YF committee meetings and are encouraged to do so. Some committee meetings will be held in person, and some by phone conference. The funding from Yearly Meeting to travel to these meeting will generally only be available to those on the committee however if there are people who really need to be there to speak to particular issues, financial assistance for travel may be able to be considered.
PRO-ACTIVENESS
The issue of "How pro-active do we want to be?" i.e. organizing events for YFs etc. was raised. However, with the move to becoming our own general meeting on the cards, it sounds like there is going to be plenty for us to be pro-active about, particularly in the lead up to Yearly Meeting where we foresee plenty of debate and discussion occurring. Hence we want to be in the best possible position of understanding about what it is we're trying to achieve when we get to Yearly Meeting.
YEARLY MEETING:
The YF Committee will meet again in full at Yearly Meeting along with the other YFs present. Thomas is going to talk with Lynn Richards about what our session needs to include, and if could be solely about "The Minute"? And also to find out whether Jimmy's report back about Aussie YM/YF is expected to in that presentation time slot.
We want to be well prepared for this presentation and the likely questioning that will arise. So we need to establish the Why? What? How? Who? aspects of our desire to become a general meeting in order to field these questions with understanding and confidence. In order to do this we will utilize the available internet communications networks, and talk to YF’s around NZ so that we will feel as though we are accurately representing YF’s at Yearly Meeting.
- more soon. a PDF of this will uploaded onto grouphug
if you want to download that. Will keep everyone posted about YF issues and YM.
cheerz ...ben!
| |
Sunday, 21 May 2006
|
|
Ooh - I just got mail! From Penelope
| |
|
Ooh - I just got mail!
From Penelope Dunkley who says that there is room for 6 YF's to sleep at the
Nelson meeting house. She also says that the deadline for getting in
registration is the 30th of June. I've got a blank registration form, which I
can scan and send to anyone - or even better go have a look inside the NZ
Friend's newsletter - there's one there on the middlest pages, so you can
just rip it out.
Schweeet.
Thomas.
| |
|
|
Young Friends Epistle
| |
|
To Friends everywhere,
New Zealand Young Friends gathered over Easter
in 2006, nestled in the Kahuterawa valley outside of Palmerston North. There
were 37 of us in total, but the people grew around us as Friends graced us with
their presence, then returned to their lives.
We relied on the hospitality and goodwill of
Friends to make our camp a success and to Alastair and Anne Hall, we thank you
for letting us into your home and into your hearts. We were part of the
environment, engaging in the regrowth of native plants and the regrowth of
ourselves.
For many, Young Friends camp is one of the few
instances where time freezes, enabling us to interact without the pressure of
the outside world.
We felt that with the wind in the trees, and
the songs in the air, we could change things. And we are changing. For half a
day, we pursued an elusive minute which heralds a new dawning for Young Friends
in New Zealand.
We hope this epistle finds you
well.
| |
|
|
Summer Gathering 06-07
| |
|
We’re part of the Wellington-based- but-with-other-interested-people committee which is planning the next Summer Gathering, which will be in Silverstream (Hutt Valley) from 28 December to 5 January.
One of the things we would like to do this year is integrate the age groups more in each other’s activities and one of the ways we aim to do this is by giving the evening sessions/activities more of a YF focus. We envisage that this could mean that sessions might be run by YFs, but don’t panic if the idea of this would make you run away in terror… however we definitely want suggestions and feedback about the planning and structure so that everyone gets a chance to contribute. And if you would like to run session(s), or can suggest somebody else who might be good, let us know!
The theme is broadly ‘HISTORY’; with specific focus on the three areas of: international Quaker history; our own history of Quakers in New Zealand; plus, as it’s the 50th anniversary of Summer Gathering – celebrating the stories and memories of past Summer Gatherings.
We will be exploring these ideas at our next meeting, which will be in Wellington on Saturday 17 June, 10-4 at the Quaker Centre (bring lunch), and everyone is welcome to come, or let us know your thoughts beforehand if you can’t make it in person. There’s the blog (ie comment below), there’s the Grouphug email list, or our Committee email: summergathering@gmail.com or you could be old-fashioned and actually speak to us!
Looking forward to hearing from you,
Frances (H), Marion, Anna, Quentin, Bridie
| |
Monday, 15 May 2006
|
|
Even more photos
| |
|
I've finally got round to uploading a few pictures from YF camp, and some more from general YF stuff in Wellington over the last few weeks. They are on Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/75455666@N00/ and tagged with either 'yfcamp2006' or 'yfs'.
Love, Frances
| |
Friday, 12 May 2006
|
|
YFs Gathering in India?
| |
|
(taken from the newsletter of Friends World Committee for Consultation, Asia West Pacific Section... or FWCC AWPS!)
Australian Young Friends met both before and during Australian Yearly Meeting held in Brisbane in January this year. Australian YFs are involved in many of the activities of the YM, including issues around child protection, sexual abuse and misconduct and the fun and singing throughout the week. This year, many of us are particularly excited about International Quakerism. With six Australians at the WGYF in Lancaster, one at the WGYF in Kenya, and one YF at the (FWCC AWP) Section gathering in Korea, we are feeling excited about strengthening connections within the Region.
One of the ideas that came out of all this international Quakerism is to have an Asia West Pacific YF gathering. We hope this will happen at the same time as the next section gathering, in Bhopal 2008. At this stage, we are looking to make contact with each YM in the section, so would love to hear from at least one YF in each Yearly Meeting. We would like input from all YFs in the section and in the next few months will be making contact with YFs throughout the AWPS.
If you are interested in being involved in organising, or willing to be an initial contact person for your YM, please contact:
Emily Chapman-Searle, em8smem@yahoo.com or Hannah Chapman-Searle, hanspan333@yahoo.com.au
| |
Sunday, 07 May 2006
|
|
Internship opportunity in Philadelphia
| |
|
This came through on the WGYF email list - FGC is the branch of Quakerism in the USA closest in theology and practice to Aotearoa New Zealand YM ie liberal unprogrammed.
love & light
Anna
One-Year Internship Position at Friends General Conference (mid July 2006- mid July 2007)
Friends General Conference nourishes the spiritual lives of Friends and Friends meetings in the unprogrammed tradition throughout North America. The internship is offered by the Publications and Distribution Program with additional duties under the care of the Committee for Ministry on Racism.
Brief Description of the internship
In 2007 Quaker Press of FGC launches a major new book— Fit for Freedom, Not for Friendship: The Relationship between African Americans and the Religious Society of Friends from the Colonial Period to the Present (working title). Quaker Press
anticipates that this two volume set of books will be of interest both within and beyond the Religious Society of Friends. The intern will assist the publications manager with promoting the book, setting up book signings, author events and
other events as appropriate. She/he will learn about book marketing: researching mailing lists, preparing marketing copy, doing follow-up calls to bookstores, meetings and reviewers, placing advertisements, etc. In addition, she/he will
assist the staff coordinator for the Committee for Ministry on Racism to use the book and accompanying study guide with monthly, quarterly and yearly meeting to address issues of racism within the Religious Society of Friends.
Qualifications: A member of the Religious Society of Friends
- with some experience of the wider Quaker world,
- some experience working against racism,
- share an understanding and concern for working against racism
- have completed several complex projects involving research.
Skills: marketing work requires:
- excellent research skills
- excellent listening skills
- writing clearly and to the point
- experience working with computer programs in word processing, data base management and Excel
- ability to multitask and network
- excellence with details, flexible and able to deal with the unexpected
- personable and confident on the phone
- able to handle a lot of follow up and follow through while remaining organized
Timing: begin around July 17, 2006 for approximately one year, ending with the
option of attending the FGC 2007 Gathering in River Falls, WI July 1-7, 2007.
Hours: Full time: 35 hours/week, 5 days/week
Compensation: Salary $1500/month with benefits including health insurance
Application Deadline: 5 pm, May 30, 2006
Application process
Send a letter stating your interest in this internship, experience with Quaker projects both in and beyond your monthly meeting, work you’ve participated in against racism and relevant marketing and research skills. Please include a resume of education, jobs and volunteer work and a list of 3-5 references with e-mail addresses and phone numbers.
Applications can be sent to:
Barbara Hirshkowitz
Friends General Conference
1216 Arch Street, 2B
Philadelphia, PA 19107
Applications must be received by 5pm on May 30, 2006. Interviews will be schedule in early June with a decision anticipated by mid-June. Start date in mid July.
| |
Friday, 05 May 2006
|
|
Mooooore Photos online
| |
|
Oh yes .. well I didn't take many .. but they are now all online at http://www.flickr.com/photos/tags/yfcamp2006/
so enjoy!!
Luf BEN!!
| |
Saturday, 29 April 2006
|
|
AWOL Affirmation Sheets
| |
|
ok, so some of us stuffed up - has anyone got or seen Bridie's and/or Marion's Affirmation Sheets from Camp?!
We all thought someone else was bringing them to Wellington.... sooooooooooo sorry
Fran G - I've got yours, Zanna left it with me! =)
| |
Thursday, 27 April 2006
|
|
Llyn Richards' (the YM clerk) reply.
| |
|
Dear Thomas,
Most interesting!
You have not missed White Papers since I am working on them right now, collating into the text all the Monthly Meeting and Committee reports. I am very happy to incorporate your minute. I do have some stuff from Marion so that needs to go in also.
When I was trying to
work out how YM Nominations could be more systematic I wrote a paper and sent it
out with the 2005 February YM Clerk's letter, but it was a lead balloon.
However, you'll be interested to know that it contained a suggestion that
YFs be included in the process when we are trying to find a suitable "name"
(Quaker talk for a person!) for some particular job. I thought that idea also
had never got over the thought-horizon but suddenly it has been suggested that a
YF (or perhaps just a "younger person") should be on YM Nominations Committee.
An idea whose time has come?
I will be pleased to have you talk to the
ideas in your minutes at Yearly Meeting. I will not be able to tell you
until Gold Papers come out in early July where exactly in the programme agenda
YFs will fit, but probably on Saturday afternoon.
Good to hear from you
Walk cheerfully,
Llyn
(posted by Thomas)
| |
Sunday, 23 April 2006
|
|
yf camp photos
| |
|
Kia ora tatou!
I've uploaded (most of) my photo's to Flickr now (Ben you'll be glad to know I left the most unflattering ones off =) !) Julian has done the same and you can see both lots at
http://www.flickr.com/photos/tags/yfcamp2006/
If anyone else uses Flickr and is uploading their pics add the tag yfcamp2006 and they'll show up here too =)
arohanui
Anna D
| |
|
|
Business Meeting Minutes
| |
|
I'll be honest. I couldn't find all the material. In fact, I couldn't find very much of it at all. So, if there are names I have left off the YM committee nominations please tell me (or you could even edit them yourselves!) - as a side note how exactly do we turn these into a committee and am I YF coordinator - it hasn't quite been discussed properly?
Also, if there are any other minutes, that we
made that you cannot see - apart from THE minute, then please tell me
:D
Minutes from the Young Friends meeting for
worship for business (15th – 16th April 2006)
1.
David
started by welcoming everybody to the meeting including our international
travelers – Thomas Ashton (the Australian YM representative), Beth Smith and
Alex Simpson (both from the UK)
2.
The
following people nominated themselves for writing the camp epistle:
Thomas Watts
Avon Pugmire
Leith Pugmire
Charlotte Gordon
They were reminded the epistle is not simply a
report on what happened at the camp; rather an attempt to capture the workings
of the spirit at the camp.
3.
David
Mottram has stepped down from his roles as YF coordinator and Camp coordinator.
The following people have been nominated for specific positions on the YF
committee:
Thomas
Watts
(YF coordinator)
Julian
Carver
(Yfronts – YF communications)
Jimmy Green
(Treasurer)
Ben
Watts
(Co-coordinator)
While, the following people have expressed an
interest with being on the committee in some form: Chris Mottram, Chris Hall,
Suzanna Remmerswaal, Richard Mottram, Leith Pugmire and Bridie Zwanikken.
We feel that the Young Friends committee should
encompass the 4-8 people that have been nominated. It is hoped that the
advancements in YF communication (as outlined in minute 4) will make it easier
for a greater level of involvement from the rest of the
group.
4.
The
feeling of the meeting was that we wanted a way to stay in touch with each
other. There were a number of suggestions including the possibility of a
newsletter, weblog and an internet forum. Whilst doing this, we would like to
remain sensitive towards overburdening inboxes with
information
5.
Jimmy
Green spoke of his experiences as the New Zealand Yearly Meeting representative
to Australian YM and YF. The following people have been nominated by the group:
Avon, Simon and Rowan Lookmire (as a
threesome)
Joe Beautrais
Anna
Fay
Bridie Zwanikken
Chris Hall
Fran Gliesner
Joanne Hall
Ria Pugmire
Suzanna Remmerswaal
6.
The dates
for New Zealand Yearly Meeting were tabled and it was hoped that there would be
as great a YF contingent as possible – ie more than just those who went to WGYF
and AYM/YF.
7.
We read
Sue Stover’s proposal regarding what we see as a blurring of the upper age range
at JYF. We support this proposal as we see it as a excellent way for YF’s to get
leadership experience. Also, we see it as being a better way to lessen the jump
from being a JYF to becoming a YF.
Love and Light.
Thomas.
| |
|
|
The Minute
| |
|
Those gathered here feel led to express our
belief that Young Friends are a distinct entity and would like to be recognised
as a formal structure in our own right; a status Young Friends have within other
Yearly Meetings.
We are considering calling ourselves
Aotearoa/New Zealand Young Friend’s meeting.
We are guided by the definition of a General
Meeting used in Britain, but do not feel we are limited by
this.
We ask your loving support through this
process.
Comments? Criticisms? Rubber Stamping? All
welcome.
May God hold you all in the light.
(Thomas)
| |
Tuesday, 18 April 2006
|
|
Deuteronomy 29:19
| |
'If anyone should think to himself, "I will do well enough if I follow the dictates of my heart,"...'
| |
|
|
Deuteronomy 29:20
| |
'...Yahweh will not pardon him. His wrath shall burn against him.'
| |
|
|
Deuteronomy 29:20
| |
'And all the curses written in the book will come upon him.'
| |
|
|
Deuteronomy 29:20
| |
'Yahweh will single him out for misfortune and blot out his name from under heaven.'
| |
|
|
Email Addresses
| |
|
Right, well, here's my first post . . . I'm gonna add my email address as a comment below, and then you guys can email me or add me to your msn contacts list. Yay! Feel free to do the same if you're so inclined :) This blog is unlisted, so people can only find it if they type in the exact url, so hopefully there won't be any non-yf-type-people snitching your details off here . . .
| |
|
|
Profile
|

- Name: God
- Visitors: 19132
Hi. This is God. I thought you guys needed a modern medium with which to enhance your spirituality.
Flaming bushes are so last month (and also pose a fire hazard . . . not to mention being irresponsible in times of drought). Remember that there is that of me in you.
Don't be freaked out, that's not meant literally. Please note that disrespect will result in damnation, hellfire, and mildew. Later.
|
Blog Posts
|
|
|
Archives
|
|
|
|

|
|
Marion I think the Quaker way could sit well with you. To update Georgie, Quakers marry each other by making promises to each other in the presence of God and witnesses. All the witnesses sign the certificate to say they were there, and also as part of their promise to help uphold the marriage in the future (quite a commitment upon them!! - to pay back for food etc at the reception!) I think the 'God' in question is the god of the two people marrying so that is open to your interpretation. The vows are also your own. The suggested versions use the words "with God's love" and "with divine intervention" but I believe these stem from the British system where what vows you make are based in the law. This is not the case here in NZ, so I presume you can say what you want. I believe, Quakers are only allowed to marry their own in law (ie you can't walk off the street and say you'd like to be married in a Quaker Meeting), so you do have to be an active member/attender/offspiring of such. (08/18/06)
Leith Pugmire Ahh, sorry guys, and thanks Anna . . . there I go trying to impersonate God again, lol. The above post was from me :) (08/16/06)
anna d Leith is this your post? I'm assuming so... 16.01 For the right joining in marriage is the work of the Lord only, and not the priests' or magistrates'; for it is God's ordinance and not man's; and therefore Friends cannot consent that they should join them together: for we marry none; it is the Lord's work, and we are but witnesses. George Fox, 1669 (taken from Britain YM Quaker faith & Practice - the 'red book') Whilst the legal bits may say a marriage/civil union has been done 'by' Quakers the Quaker bits of it all don't! However I'm not sure how current practice based on Fox's quote above sits with your atheist beliefs (I'm sure that's not the right word...) (08/16/06)
Jonathan I did this recently, and I don't think we wrote anything in for who married us. It was signed by the registrar, but not as if they had done it. C-L has the copy of the licence somewhere if it needs to be checked. I have an objection to Quaker Civil Unions. In my understanding, there is the Quaker marriage, and then a legal form filled in for convenience. A civil union seems to only be about the legal recognition, so the Quaker part recognised by God doesn't seem to have a place. The problem then is that the law recognises same sex civil unions but not marriages, so I'll support Quaker Marriages legally recognised as civil unions if anyone requests it. (08/21/06)